Spark Writes🔗
To use Iceberg in Spark, first configure Spark catalogs.
Some plans are only available when using Iceberg SQL extensions in Spark 3.
Iceberg uses Apache Spark's DataSourceV2 API for data source and catalog implementations. Spark DSv2 is an evolving API with different levels of support in Spark versions:
Feature support | Spark 3 | Notes |
---|---|---|
SQL insert into | ✔️ | ⚠ Requires spark.sql.storeAssignmentPolicy=ANSI (default since Spark 3.0) |
SQL merge into | ✔️ | ⚠ Requires Iceberg Spark extensions |
SQL insert overwrite | ✔️ | ⚠ Requires spark.sql.storeAssignmentPolicy=ANSI (default since Spark 3.0) |
SQL delete from | ✔️ | ⚠ Row-level delete requires Iceberg Spark extensions |
SQL update | ✔️ | ⚠ Requires Iceberg Spark extensions |
DataFrame append | ✔️ | |
DataFrame overwrite | ✔️ | |
DataFrame CTAS and RTAS | ✔️ | ⚠ Requires DSv2 API |
Writing with SQL🔗
Spark 3 supports SQL INSERT INTO
, MERGE INTO
, and INSERT OVERWRITE
, as well as the new DataFrameWriterV2
API.
INSERT INTO
🔗
To append new data to a table, use INSERT INTO
.
MERGE INTO
🔗
Spark 3 added support for MERGE INTO
queries that can express row-level updates.
Iceberg supports MERGE INTO
by rewriting data files that contain rows that need to be updated in an overwrite
commit.
MERGE INTO
is recommended instead of INSERT OVERWRITE
because Iceberg can replace only the affected data files, and because the data overwritten by a dynamic overwrite may change if the table's partitioning changes.
MERGE INTO
syntax🔗
MERGE INTO
updates a table, called the target table, using a set of updates from another query, called the source. The update for a row in the target table is found using the ON
clause that is like a join condition.
MERGE INTO prod.db.target t -- a target table
USING (SELECT ...) s -- the source updates
ON t.id = s.id -- condition to find updates for target rows
WHEN ... -- updates
Updates to rows in the target table are listed using WHEN MATCHED ... THEN ...
. Multiple MATCHED
clauses can be added with conditions that determine when each match should be applied. The first matching expression is used.
WHEN MATCHED AND s.op = 'delete' THEN DELETE
WHEN MATCHED AND t.count IS NULL AND s.op = 'increment' THEN UPDATE SET t.count = 0
WHEN MATCHED AND s.op = 'increment' THEN UPDATE SET t.count = t.count + 1
Source rows (updates) that do not match can be inserted:
Inserts also support additional conditions:
Only one record in the source data can update any given row of the target table, or else an error will be thrown.
Spark 3.5 added support for WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE ... THEN ...
to update or delete rows that are not present in the source data:
INSERT OVERWRITE
🔗
INSERT OVERWRITE
can replace data in the table with the result of a query. Overwrites are atomic operations for Iceberg tables.
The partitions that will be replaced by INSERT OVERWRITE
depends on Spark's partition overwrite mode and the partitioning of a table. MERGE INTO
can rewrite only affected data files and has more easily understood behavior, so it is recommended instead of INSERT OVERWRITE
.
Overwrite behavior🔗
Spark's default overwrite mode is static, but dynamic overwrite mode is recommended when writing to Iceberg tables. Static overwrite mode determines which partitions to overwrite in a table by converting the PARTITION
clause to a filter, but the PARTITION
clause can only reference table columns.
Dynamic overwrite mode is configured by setting spark.sql.sources.partitionOverwriteMode=dynamic
.
To demonstrate the behavior of dynamic and static overwrites, consider a logs
table defined by the following DDL:
CREATE TABLE prod.my_app.logs (
uuid string NOT NULL,
level string NOT NULL,
ts timestamp NOT NULL,
message string)
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (level, hours(ts))
Dynamic overwrite🔗
When Spark's overwrite mode is dynamic, partitions that have rows produced by the SELECT
query will be replaced.
For example, this query removes duplicate log events from the example logs
table.
INSERT OVERWRITE prod.my_app.logs
SELECT uuid, first(level), first(ts), first(message)
FROM prod.my_app.logs
WHERE cast(ts as date) = '2020-07-01'
GROUP BY uuid
In dynamic mode, this will replace any partition with rows in the SELECT
result. Because the date of all rows is restricted to 1 July, only hours of that day will be replaced.
Static overwrite🔗
When Spark's overwrite mode is static, the PARTITION
clause is converted to a filter that is used to delete from the table. If the PARTITION
clause is omitted, all partitions will be replaced.
Because there is no PARTITION
clause in the query above, it will drop all existing rows in the table when run in static mode, but will only write the logs from 1 July.
To overwrite just the partitions that were loaded, add a PARTITION
clause that aligns with the SELECT
query filter:
INSERT OVERWRITE prod.my_app.logs
PARTITION (level = 'INFO')
SELECT uuid, first(level), first(ts), first(message)
FROM prod.my_app.logs
WHERE level = 'INFO'
GROUP BY uuid
Note that this mode cannot replace hourly partitions like the dynamic example query because the PARTITION
clause can only reference table columns, not hidden partitions.
DELETE FROM
🔗
Spark 3 added support for DELETE FROM
queries to remove data from tables.
Delete queries accept a filter to match rows to delete.
DELETE FROM prod.db.table
WHERE ts >= '2020-05-01 00:00:00' and ts < '2020-06-01 00:00:00'
DELETE FROM prod.db.all_events
WHERE session_time < (SELECT min(session_time) FROM prod.db.good_events)
DELETE FROM prod.db.orders AS t1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT oid FROM prod.db.returned_orders WHERE t1.oid = oid)
If the delete filter matches entire partitions of the table, Iceberg will perform a metadata-only delete. If the filter matches individual rows of a table, then Iceberg will rewrite only the affected data files.
UPDATE
🔗
Update queries accept a filter to match rows to update.
UPDATE prod.db.table
SET c1 = 'update_c1', c2 = 'update_c2'
WHERE ts >= '2020-05-01 00:00:00' and ts < '2020-06-01 00:00:00'
UPDATE prod.db.all_events
SET session_time = 0, ignored = true
WHERE session_time < (SELECT min(session_time) FROM prod.db.good_events)
UPDATE prod.db.orders AS t1
SET order_status = 'returned'
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT oid FROM prod.db.returned_orders WHERE t1.oid = oid)
For more complex row-level updates based on incoming data, see the section on MERGE INTO
.
Writing to Branches🔗
The branch must exist before performing write. Operations do not create the branch if it does not exist. A branch can be created using Spark DDL.
Info
Note: When writing to a branch, the current schema of the table will be used for validation.
Via SQL🔗
Branch writes can be performed by providing a branch identifier, branch_yourBranch
in the operation.
Branch writes can also be performed as part of a write-audit-publish (WAP) workflow by specifying the spark.wap.branch
config.
Note WAP branch and branch identifier cannot both be specified.
-- INSERT (1,' a') (2, 'b') into the audit branch.
INSERT INTO prod.db.table.branch_audit VALUES (1, 'a'), (2, 'b');
-- MERGE INTO audit branch
MERGE INTO prod.db.table.branch_audit t
USING (SELECT ...) s
ON t.id = s.id
WHEN ...
-- UPDATE audit branch
UPDATE prod.db.table.branch_audit AS t1
SET val = 'c'
-- DELETE FROM audit branch
DELETE FROM prod.dbl.table.branch_audit WHERE id = 2;
-- WAP Branch write
SET spark.wap.branch = audit-branch
INSERT INTO prod.db.table VALUES (3, 'c');
Via DataFrames🔗
Branch writes via DataFrames can be performed by providing a branch identifier, branch_yourBranch
in the operation.
// To insert into `audit` branch
val data: DataFrame = ...
data.writeTo("prod.db.table.branch_audit").append()
// To overwrite `audit` branch
val data: DataFrame = ...
data.writeTo("prod.db.table.branch_audit").overwritePartitions()
Writing with DataFrames🔗
Spark 3 introduced the new DataFrameWriterV2
API for writing to tables using data frames. The v2 API is recommended for several reasons:
- CTAS, RTAS, and overwrite by filter are supported
- All operations consistently write columns to a table by name
- Hidden partition expressions are supported in
partitionedBy
- Overwrite behavior is explicit, either dynamic or by a user-supplied filter
- The behavior of each operation corresponds to SQL statements
df.writeTo(t).create()
is equivalent toCREATE TABLE AS SELECT
df.writeTo(t).replace()
is equivalent toREPLACE TABLE AS SELECT
df.writeTo(t).append()
is equivalent toINSERT INTO
df.writeTo(t).overwritePartitions()
is equivalent to dynamicINSERT OVERWRITE
The v1 DataFrame write
API is still supported, but is not recommended.
Danger
When writing with the v1 DataFrame API in Spark 3, use saveAsTable
or insertInto
to load tables with a catalog.
Using format("iceberg")
loads an isolated table reference that will not automatically refresh tables used by queries.
Appending data🔗
To append a dataframe to an Iceberg table, use append
:
Overwriting data🔗
To overwrite partitions dynamically, use overwritePartitions()
:
To explicitly overwrite partitions, use overwrite
to supply a filter:
Creating tables🔗
To run a CTAS or RTAS, use create
, replace
, or createOrReplace
operations:
If you have replaced the default Spark catalog (spark_catalog
) with Iceberg's SparkSessionCatalog
, do:
Create and replace operations support table configuration methods, like partitionedBy
and tableProperty
:
data.writeTo("prod.db.table")
.tableProperty("write.format.default", "orc")
.partitionedBy($"level", days($"ts"))
.createOrReplace()
The Iceberg table location can also be specified by the location
table property:
Schema Merge🔗
While inserting or updating Iceberg is capable of resolving schema mismatch at runtime. If configured, Iceberg will perform an automatic schema evolution as follows:
-
A new column is present in the source but not in the target table.
The new column is added to the target table. Column values are set to
NULL
in all the rows already present in the table -
A column is present in the target but not in the source.
The target column value is set to
NULL
when inserting or left unchanged when updating the row.
The target table must be configured to accept any schema change by setting the property write.spark.accept-any-schema
to true
.
mergeSchema
option.
Writing Distribution Modes🔗
Iceberg's default Spark writers require that the data in each spark task is clustered by partition values. This
distribution is required to minimize the number of file handles that are held open while writing. By default, starting
in Iceberg 1.2.0, Iceberg also requests that Spark pre-sort data to be written to fit this distribution. The
request to Spark is done through the table property write.distribution-mode
with the value hash
. Spark doesn't respect
distribution mode in CTAS/RTAS before 3.5.0.
Let's go through writing the data against below sample table:
CREATE TABLE prod.db.sample (
id bigint,
data string,
category string,
ts timestamp)
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (days(ts), category)
To write data to the sample table, data needs to be sorted by days(ts), category
but this is taken care
of automatically by the default hash
distribution. Previously this would have required manually sorting, but this
is no longer the case.
There are 3 options for write.distribution-mode
none
- This is the previous default for Iceberg.
This mode does not request any shuffles or sort to be performed automatically by Spark. Because no work is done automatically by Spark, the data must be manually sorted by partition value. The data must be sorted either within each spark task, or globally within the entire dataset. A global sort will minimize the number of output files.
A sort can be avoided by using the Spark write fanout property but this will cause all file handles to remain open until each write task has completed.hash
- This mode is the new default and requests that Spark uses a hash-based exchange to shuffle the incoming write data before writing.
Practically, this means that each row is hashed based on the row's partition value and then placed in a corresponding Spark task based upon that value. Further division and coalescing of tasks may take place because of Spark's Adaptive Query planning.range
- This mode requests that Spark perform a range based exchange to shuffle the data before writing.
This is a two stage procedure which is more expensive than thehash
mode. The first stage samples the data to be written based on the partition and sort columns. The second stage uses the range information to shuffle the input data into Spark tasks. Each task gets an exclusive range of the input data which clusters the data by partition and also globally sorts.
While this is more expensive than the hash distribution, the global ordering can be beneficial for read performance if sorted columns are used during queries. This mode is used by default if a table is created with a sort-order. Further division and coalescing of tasks may take place because of Spark's Adaptive Query planning.
Controlling File Sizes🔗
When writing data to Iceberg with Spark, it's important to note that Spark cannot write a file larger than a Spark
task and a file cannot span an Iceberg partition boundary. This means although Iceberg will always roll over a file
when it grows to write.target-file-size-bytes
, but unless the Spark task is
large enough that will not happen. The size of the file created on disk will also be much smaller than the Spark task
since the on disk data will be both compressed and in columnar format as opposed to Spark's uncompressed row
representation. This means a 100 megabyte Spark task will create a file much smaller than 100 megabytes even if that
task is writing to a single Iceberg partition. If the task writes to multiple partitions, the files will be even
smaller than that.
To control what data ends up in each Spark task use a write distribution mode
or manually repartition the data.
To adjust Spark's task size it is important to become familiar with Spark's various Adaptive Query Execution (AQE)
parameters. When the write.distribution-mode
is not none
, AQE will control the coalescing and splitting of Spark
tasks during the exchange to try to create tasks of spark.sql.adaptive.advisoryPartitionSizeInBytes
size. These
settings will also affect any user performed re-partitions or sorts.
It is important again to note that this is the in-memory Spark row size and not the on disk
columnar-compressed size, so a larger value than the target file size will need to be specified. The ratio of
in-memory size to on disk size is data dependent. Future work in Spark should allow Iceberg to automatically adjust this
parameter at write time to match the write.target-file-size-bytes
.